monitoring_data
region 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
volume salvage project decision decision monitoring (ccf) or green no. name type date participants forest Lolo 1 Weber Salvagememo 08-03-2001 Larry Svalberg/ 329 Salvage Idaho Panhandle 1 Along Haul Salvage Sale 10-02-2001 Dave Roberts/Wildlife 128 Salvage memo Biologist Idaho Panhandle 1 In Between Timber Sale 10-16-2001 Lisa Hawdon, Fisheries Biologist memo 1000 Green Idaho Panhandle 2 English Point Salvage Sale10-24-2001 Jack Dorrell / Recreation and Scenery Management memo 1931 Salvage Clearwater 1 Laundry Salvage 10-08-96 09-26-2000 Stephen PetroEdward Daubson memo 1079 Salvage memo 10-27-1999 Ken Hotchkiss 483 Green Clearwater 2 Mire Creek Thinning 11-21-97 memo 10-30-2001 Steve 40 Green Gallatin 1 Squaw Creek Fules Reduction Timber Sale Cassani, Gallatin 2 Loose Goose Post and Pole Harvest memo 10-30-2001 Steve Cassani, 20 Green memo 10-30-2001 Ed Monnig/Ranger 39 Salvage Kootenai 1 Sinclair Salvage Timber Sale Timber 10-31-2001 Brian Avery/District Ranger 303 Salvage Kootenai 2 Bull Liber SSTSmemo Sale Lewis and Clark 15 Foothills Salvage memo 10-31-2001 Steve Martin/Silviculturist Salvage 300 Lewis and Clark 15 Dead Clyde Salvage memo 10-31-2001 Steve Martin/Silviculturist Salvage 2522 Beaverhead/DeerlodgeBPA / MT. Princeton 2 memo 10-29-2001 Joe Harper, Wildlife Biologist 404 Green Flathead 2 Swaney Fire Salvage and Fuels Reduction Kollmeyer notice 09-07-2001 Jane 1289 Salvage memo 07-31-2001 This project was selected as a pilot stewardship dem 440 Green Flathead 1 Cedar Flats Vegetation Project Custer 1 Three Mile Salvage Sale 08-06-2001 Dennis Sandbak memo 400 Salvage Beaverhead/Deerlodge1996 Post and Pole Sale 10-18-2001 Lee Harry, Silviculturist 1996 memo 300 Green White River 2 White Owl Salvage Timber 07-14-1999 Tom Johnston, memo Sale 907 Salvage White River 1 Bar Angle Environmental Analysis notice 08-21-2001 Bob Kapushion 1000 Salvage #4 Deadwood 06-08-2001 Chris Thomas, C.F./ForestSalvage 120 Silviculturist Bighorn 1 Cone Mountain memo memo 10-19-2001 Bob Frye/Biological Scientist 155 Salvage San Juan 1 Quien Sabe Blowdown Salvage Sale Medicine Bow-Routt 1 Squirrel - Post and Pole Unit "E" notice 10-23-2001 Patrick Harrison 250 Green Medicine Bow-Routt 2 Jay's Roost - Post and Pole Unit #17 notice 10-23-2001 Patrick Harrison 78 Green Pike, San Isabel NF & Comanche, Cimarron Grasslands 2120201 Squaw Creek memo 10-10-2001 Sam Schroeder, Forester Green 1287 Bighorn 2 Twister Timber memo Sale 09-01-2001 Chris Thomas/ 800 Salvage Rio Grande 1 Mountain Lion Lookout notice 10-24-2001 John Murphy/Supervisory Forester 405 Green Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, Gunnisonnotice 1 Environmental Assessment10-29-2001 Warren Young/ Ouray District Small Sales 41 Green Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, Gunnisonnotice 2 Environmental Assessment10-29-2001 Warren Young/ Ouray District Small Sales 31 Green Rio Grande 2 Heart Mountain notice Salvage 10-29-2001 Kirby Self - Small Sales49 Salvage Forester Shoshone 1 Hazard Tree Removal -- Newton Creek Campground - Timber Sale Administrator memo 06-13-2000 Dennis Eckardt 43 Salvage notice 100 Salvage Shoshone 2 Eagle Creek Campground 05-31-2001 Dennis Eckardt - Timber Sale Administrator Black Hills 1 Greenwood Salvage memo 10-29-2001 Darcie Bacon, 400 Salvage Black Hills 2 Mountain Pine Beetle Salvage -- Steamboat Project Area memo 10-29-2001 Darcie Bacon, 250 Salvage Arapaho-Roosevelt 8003059 Table Mountainnotice 10-19-2001 Lisa Bryant - Soil scientist Salvage 624 Arapaho-Roosevelt 5003067 Roadkill MPB Control Project memo 10-26-2001 Lisa Bryant - Soil Scientist Salvage 96 Carson 1 Jacques Tank Timber Sale10-18-2001 Tim Fruits - Forest Priority Green Leader memo 395 Team 10-18-2001 Timothy L. Fruits 429 Green Carson 2 Tio Timber Salememo memo 402 Green Lincoln 1 Rock Tank Timber Sale 08-28-2001 Dennis Watson Lincoln 2 Board Timber Sale memo 08-30-2001 Dennis Watson 227 Green memo 215 Tonto 1 SH87 Shading Timber Sale10-23-2001 Norm Ambos/Soil ScientistGreen Tonto 2 Shadow Timbernotice Sale 10-23-2001 Norm Ambos/Soil ScientistGreen 209 Apache-Sitgreaves 1 Southside memo 10-26-2001 Chris Nelson, Soils 273 Green Apache-Sitgreaves 2 Greer Interface memo 10-26-2001 Chris Nelson, Soils 724 Green Gila 1 General Salvage and Sanitation Activities Morrison: Wildlife Biologist memo 07-09-1999 Pat 69 Salvage memo 10-02-2001 Charlie Souders 147 Green Gila 2 NAU/Sheep Corral Road - Demonstration Project Cibola 1 Lower Cerro Colorado Thinning memo 10-31-2001 Don Olson, Timber Sale Administrator 150 Green
Page 1
monitoring_data
3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Coconino 4 Coconino 1 Fishlake 1 Fishlake 2 Manti-LaSal 1 Manti-LaSal 2 Boise 1 Caribou-Targhee 1 Caribou-Targhee 2 Boise 2 Ashley 1 Ashley 2 Payette 1 Payette 2 Wasatch-Cache 1 Wasatch-Cache 2 Eldorado 1 Eldorado 2 Plumas 1 Sierra 1 Plumas 2 Klamath 1 Shasta-Trinity 1 Shasta-Trinity 2 Lassen 1 Lassen 2 Medocino 1 Medocino 2 Sequoia 1 Stanislaus 1 Stanislaus 2 Tahoe 1 Tahoe 2 Modoc 1 Malheur 1 Malheur 2 Wenatchee 70891 Colville 1 Ochoco 1 Rogue River 76382 Mt. Hood 1 Mt. Hood 2 Okanogan 63541 Fremont 1 Winema 1 Willamette 1 Willamette 2 Colville 96994 Umatilla 1 Siuslaw 1 Siuslaw 2 Gifford Pinchot 3
Pumpkin Fire Log Removal11-02-2001 Kim Newbauer memo 198 Salvage Verde River Headwaters Riparian Restoration notice 09-19-2001 Dick Fleishman/ Soil & Water Specialist, Para Archa 43 Green Nagah Flat memo 10-15-2001 Frank Fay/Environmental Coordinator 982 Salvage Niotche Spruce memo Infestation Beetle 10-15-2001 Frank Fay/Environmental Coordinator 2000 Salvage S. Manti Salvageotice n 10-23-2001 Don Fullmer - Ecosystem Branch Chief, Doug Jones 1841 Salvage S. Manti Salvageotice n 10-23-2001 Don Fullmer - Ecosystem Branch Chief, Doug Jones 1724 Salvage Small Timber and Vegetation Management Projects (Clone) 397 Green memo 10-11-2001 Dave Rittenhouse North Skinner Salvage Timber Sale memo 10-15-2001 Lee Leffert, Hydrologist Salvage 260 South Ant Salvage Timber Sale memo 10-15-2001 Lee Leffert, Hydrologist Salvage 1025 Clear Commercial Thin notice 10-24-2001 Michael K. Dimmett 455 Green Hicks Roadsidememo Salvage 10-25-2001 Kelly Wilkins, Forestry451 Salvage Tech Kaler Hollow Salvage memo 10-25-2001 Kelly Wilkins, Forestry351 Salvage Tech Squirrel Pen Timber Sale 10-19-2001 Dave Burns - Fishery Biologist memo 465 Green Calamity Seed Production 10-19-2001 Dave Burns - Fishery Biologist memo 269 Green Slideout Beetle memo Suppression 10-01-2001 Charlie Condrat 200 Salvage Preventative Beetle Treatments - PhaseCharlie Condrat memo 10-01-2001 II 2000 Salvage Far Side Forestmemo Salvage Project Chuck Mitchell Health 10-11-2001 1960 Salvage Skydancer Forest Health Salvage Project memo 10-11-2001 Chuck Mitchell 2000 Salvage Nelson and Porter Special Salvage Timber Sale memo 10-26-2001 Roger Elam, Sale Administrator 357 Salvage Calvin Hazard Tree Project10-26-2001 Michael Price/Forester 68 Salvage memo Standley Slate Multi-product Thin Service Contract memo 10-31-2001 Paul Stancheff 426 Green Nest Blowdownmemo 09-04-2001 Jim Lucido, Timber Staff Officer 112 Salvage Summit Powerline Hazard Project memo 09-10-1998 Bill Johnson, Sale Administrator 60 Green Race Buck Blowdown Salvage Project Stan Stetson, Sale Administrator memo 09-13-2000 3372 Salvage M&M Road Hazard/Windthrow Salvage SaleWaddell/Sale Administrator memo 10-26-2001 Joe 160 Salvage Turner Road Hazard Project memo 10-26-2001 Joe Waddell/Sale Administrator 151 Salvage Coyote Blowdown Salvage 10-30-2001 Chirre Keckler/ memo 750 Salvage El Nino Blowdown Salvage 05-19-2000 Michele Light/Forest Planner memo 527 Salvage 1998 Hazard Reduction Project memo 11-15-2000 Del Pengilly, District Ranger 710 Salvage Dorrington Thinning Timber Sale notice 10-31-2001 Rob Griffith/Soil Scientist Green 88 Upper Camp SSTS memo 10-31-2001 Rob Griffith/Soil Scientist Salvage 323 Henness (7/7/98) memo 11-01-2001 Patrick Farrell, 768 Salvage Henness (Gates) memo 11-01-2001 Jerry Westfall, 1349 Salvage Kepart Thinningmemo 10-26-2001 Paul Bailey - Forester 024 Green 1 448 Salvage Thunder memo 10-10-2001 Glen Westlund Camp Hazard memo 10-10-2001 Glen Westlund 260 Salvage 410 Salvage memo 10-11-2001 Jodi Leingang, 800 Salvage Trailhead Green and Salvage memo 10-11-2001 Tom Pawley, Silviculturist Green 133 Pooh Bear Roadside Timber Sale memo 10-16-2001 Art Currier / District Ranger 1028 Salvage State Hazard Timber Sale 03-22-2001 Nancy Rose, Ecosystems Staff Officer; Chuck Ande notice 160 Salvage Forest Road 70memo Tree Removal James R Rice Hazard 10-23-2001 208 Salvage Noho Salvage Sale memo 10-23-2001 James R Rice 75 Salvage Box Springs Fire Salvage 10-17-2001 Ken Radek - Forest Soil Scientist memo 126 Salvage 1865 Salvage Rim Salvage memo 10-24-2001 Jack B. Sheehan Acting Deputy Forest Supervisor Dispersed Site Firewood Sales memo 10-24-2001 Jack Sheehan Acting Deputy Forest Supervisor Br 85 Salvage Koch Salvage EA notice 10-23-2001 John Poet - Forestry Technician 56 Salvage Cayuse Salvage notice 10-23-2001 John Poet, forestry technician and salvage sale coor 66 Salvage Wash Creek Salvage notice 10-26-2001 Steve Kramer 120 Salvage Miners A Post and Pole Area memo 10-24-2001 Ralph Hartman 220 Green Beaver Creek Nursery Rehab Project Even Evensen Timber200 Salvage memo 10-25-2001 sale administrator Plot spc research thinning project memo 10-23-2001 Mary Zuschlag Resources Salvage 90 Staff Officer Cispus HTR Thin notice 10-24-2001 Tom Kogut – 834 Green
Page 2
monitoring_data
6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
Gifford Pinchot 3 Iron Creek Campground Sale memo 10-24-2001 Tom Kogut – 100 Salvage Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie Milky Way salvage 78872 memo 10-30-2001 Stuart Woolley 868 Salvage Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie Kelly Green Salvage 79037 memo 10-30-2001 Doug Schrenk/Forester - NEPA Specialist 1299 Salvage notice 10-30-2001 Monty Wilson 220 Salvage Willamette 3 Blue River Ranger District 2000 Roadside Salvage memo 10-18-2001 Rod Johnson/Zone WildlifeSalvage 120 Biologist Umatilla 2 Spouter Salvage Timber Sale Wallowa-Whitman 1 Unity Hazard Tree Timber Sale memo 02-06-1996 Timber Sale Administrator Salvage 60 memo 10-31-2001 Jim Schlaich 745 Salvage Deschutes 1 Slae Timber Sale memo 10-25-2001 Biologist Olympic 1 North & South Hazard Salvage Sales Phil DeCillis, Fisheries240 Salvage Olympic 2 Gas Salvage Sale memo 10-25-2001 Phil DeCillis, Fisheries240 Salvage Biologist Wallowa-Whitman 2 Bear Scatter Blow Down Salvage memo 09-18-1997 Steve Howes-Soil ScientistSalvage 1988 Umpqua 1 Catamount memo 11-05-2001 Mike Hupp, Forester 1330 Salvage 2001 Administrative Officer Umpqua 2 Taft Salvage memo 11-05-2001 Mike Hupp. LMP Staff and Salvage National Forests in MS Suppression of notice 974282 Southern Pine Beetle Robert Smistik 09-28-2001 70 Salvage Kisatchie 1 Storm Salvage memo 09-12-2001 Holly Morgan/Forester 50 Salvage 09-12-2001 Holly Morgan/Forester 50 Green Kisatchie 2 Compartment 8memo National Forests in Florida Oak Timber Sale and Related Activities 1 Live notice 10-19-2001 Richard Shelfer 370 Green George Washington 1 Alba Salvage Timber Sale 10-17-2001 Jim Sitton/Forester 396 Salvage & Jefferson memo George Washington 2 Archer Run Fuelwood Timber Sale & Jefferson memo 10-18-2001 Jim Sitton/Forester 152 Green memo 10-22-2001 Mary Dodson, South Zone Green Biologist 441 Wildlife Cherokee 1 Huckleberry Ridge Cherokee 2 Little Mountian memo 10-22-2001 Mary Dodson South Zone Wildlife Biologist 469 Green Francis Marion and Sumter 1 Compartment 260 memo 10-24-2001 Dell Frost, Silviculturist 76 Green 1 Francis Marion and Sumter Sale in Compartment 292 2 Timber memo 10-24-2001 Dell Frost, Long Cane 292 Green Silviculturist National Forests in Florida 2 Hogback Fire Salvage memo 10-15-2001 Laura Lowrey, 1288 Salvage Ozark-St. Francis 1 Commercial Thinning of Shortleaf Pine in Compartment 71 memo 10-29-2001 Mark Burge - Forester 83 Green National Forests in AL SPB Spot 1207memo 263 07-26-2001 Art Goddard - Soil 89 Salvage Ozark-St. Francis 2 Little Bigger Salvage Project memo 10-29-2001 Mark Burge - Forester 4 Salvage National Forests in AL SPB Spot 1052memo 265 07-26-2001 Art Goddard - Soil 379 Salvage National Forests in MS Scotts Branch Tornado Salvage 2 notice 06-01-1996 Jeff Bein - Silviculturist 6909 Salvage Chattahoochee-Oconee 1 Hurricane Opal memo Roadside 10-30-2001 Cindy Wentworth 50 Salvage Chattahoochee-Oconee 2 Hurricane Opal memo Salvage- Howard Gap Wentworth Timber 10-30-2001 Cindy 4 Salvage National Forests & Grasslands in Texas 1 C-41 Project memo 11-17-1998 Rob Evans/Botanist 1185 Green National Forests & Grasslands in Texas & 106 Project 2 Compartments 98 notice 11-17-1998 Rob Evans/Botanist 490 Green National Forests & Grasslands in Texas & 117 Project 3 Compartments 90 notice 12-06-2000 Suzanne Walker 554 Green Ouachita 1 Compart. 1630 memo Area Boundary Modification Harvest 10-10-2001 Alan Clingrenpeel 171 Green notice 10-10-2001 Alan Clingrenpeel 1273 Salvage Ouachita 2 Incidental Salvage due to Natural Disturbance National Forests in NC White Pine Salvage 1 memo 11-16-2000 Sheryl Bryan, Fisheries Biologist 1846 Salvage National Forests in NC Lettered Rock Ridge White02-04-1999 Sandy Florence 2 memo Pine Removal 307 Green memo 721 Chippewa 29122 Jack Pine Corner Salvage 10-24-2001 Brenda Glenn/Hydrologist Salvage Chippewa 29361 White Pine Cut memo Across 10-24-2001 Brenda Glenn/Hydrologist Green 594 White Mountain 1 Mike's Pine Salvage memo 10-26-2001 Steve Fay/Soil Scientist Salvage Frank Hagan 601 White Mountain 2 Bickford Trail memo 10-26-2001 Steve Fay/Soil Scientist Green 228 Arthur G Huron Manistee 1 M-115 Salvage notice 10-29-2001 Kenneth Ennis/ 651 Salvage Huron Manistee 2 Research Pinesnotice 10-29-2001 Kenneth Ennis/ 1173 Green memo 10-29-2001 Charles Cutter 1075 Salvage Hiawatha 1 Nahma Wind Salvage Hiawatha 2 SW Fishdam Salvage memo 10-29-2001 Charles - Silvicultruist 1388 Salvage Green Mt and Finger1 Bryant Mountain Timber Sale Lakes memo 10-25-2000 Chris Casey -Silviculturist Green 387 Green Mt and Finger2 Peddlar Bridge Timber Sale Lakes memo 07-03-2000 Chris Casey - Silviculturist Green 526 memo 10-31-2001 Brent Pence - Fisheries Salvage 1108 Allegheny 1 95 Blowdown Salvage Project memo 10-31-2001 Brent Pence - Fisheries Salvage 1272 Allegheny 2 One Eighty Salvage Project Chequamegon-Nicolet Hoffman Salvage 1 memo 05-15-2000 Orville Stuart/FMO 495 Salvage memo Ridge 890 Hoosier 1 Red Pine Salvage - French12-10-1996 Bob Aynes/Forest Tech Salvage Hoosier 2 Lick Creek Emergency Salvage memo 06-10-1998 Tom Thake/Silviculturist Salvage 1586
Page 3
monitoring_data
10 10 10 10
Tongass Tongass Chugach Chugach
99423 99425 1 2
Naukati Blowdown Salvage10-12-2001 notice Sale Chasini Salvage Timber Sale notice 10-12-2001 East Fork Salvage Timber Sale memo 10-30-2001 Alder Creek Salvage Timber Sale memo 10-30-2001
Thomas Marks Thomas Marks Karen Kromrey Karen Kromrey
1773 755 210 730
Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage
Page 4
monitoring_data
miles miles miles temp permanent permanent road road road constructed constructed reconstructed 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.70 0.98 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 1.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
harvest type 1 152 231 130 230 141 220 220 220 200 200 230 111 220 121 220 230 220 114 230 230 231 110 220 151 230 210 220 220 230 230 230 230 230 230 230 152 152 121 131 200 131 220 220 230 240 220
acres of harvest type 1 3 90 20 201 59 31 5 17 36 33 73 103 37 69 145 250 50 114 350 40 125 14 10 264 63 163 12 26 10 6 5 1000 2575 156 16 18 18 124 37 48 19 30 200 50 17 25
purpose FS TC TC FS TC TC FS FS FS FS FS TC TC FS FS TC TC TC FS FS TC TC TC TC FS FS FS FS TC FS FS TC FS FS FS TC TC FS FS TC TC FS FS FS FS PP
activity code 10 1 1 10 1 1 10 10 10 30 10 1 1 10 10 1 1 1 30 10 1 1 1 1 10 10 10 10 1 20 20 1 10 10 10 1 1 30 10 1 1 90 90 90 10 80
harvest type 2 230
acres of harvest type 2 3
130 111 230 220
22 2.5 43 27
230
350
220 220
162 112
Page 5
monitoring_data
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25
0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.60 1.70 0.00 2.13 1.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
240 140 230 230 231 231 220 230 230 220 230 230 240 220 230 230 220 220 230 151 220 231 240 231 230 230 230 230 230 220 240 230 230 220 230 230 230 220 151 231 240 114 230 230 230 230 230 230 131 110 160 232
30 10 83 197 173 151 40 45 113 129 29 10 86 35 600 650 175 240 1000 3 124 10 20 20 300 200 142 70 65 15 70 30 40 246 1000 120 25 16 436 100 7 3 14 9000 20 2 1 10 25 16 4 61
FS FS TC FS FS FS FS TC TC FS TC TC FS TC FS FS FS FS FS FS FS TC FS TC FS FS FS FS TC FS FS FS FS FS TC TC TC FS FS FS FS TC TC TC FS TC TC FS TC FS FS FS
10 40 1 10 10 10 30 1 1 10 1 1 50 1 10 10 10 10 10 20 10 1 90 1 10 10 30 10 1 10 10 90 90 10 1 1 1 10 10 10 90 1 1 1 90 1 1 10 1 90 90 20
220 110
129 11
230
80
220
246
230 230
11 50
Page 6
monitoring_data
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.40 0.40 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.22 0.40 0.53 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.30
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.20 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.40 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.50 0.00 0.00 0.00
240 230 230 230 232 151 240 231 231 230 231 231 230 230 220 220 230 220 220 220 220 151 110 220 114 230 114 114 230 230 241 150 131 150 230 113 141 114 220 141 110 114 240 114 232 220 220 231 231 230 114 114
30 25 35 5 45 25 25 24 47 785 490 450 4.5 10 25 94 22 20 40 70 29 32 119 13 2 0.5 6 250 250 2 221 35 23 43 531 20 40 37 53 30 6 49 40 52 263 48 29 292 115 36 46 63
FS FS TC TC TC FS FS TC TC TC TC TC FS FS FS FS FS FS FS FS TC TC FS FS FS FS FS FS FS FS FS TC FS TC FS FS TC FS FS TC FS TC TC TC FS FS TC TC TC FS FS FS
20 10 1 1 1 90 90 1 1 1 1 1 10 10 10 30 30 20 10 10 1 1 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 50 1 50 1 10 10 1 10 10 1 30 1 1 1 10 30 1 1 1 10 10 10
152
1
230
88
230 131 113 114 121
92 22 14 11 4
Page 7
monitoring_data
0.10 0.02 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
114 230 230 230
28 11.5 24 40
TC TC FS FS
1 1 10 10
114
3
Page 8
monitoring_data
purpose FS
FS FS TC FS
TC
TC TC
activity logging code system 10 421 421 420 420 431 421 421 421 10 421 10 491 421 1 421 401 10 421 421 421 420 420 1 421 420 421 421 421 421 420 421 421 421 420 421 421 421 421 491 421 1 421 1 421 420 420 421 421 421 421 401 420 401
Soils does/not meet standards ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms dnms dnms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms
water soils does/not water monitoring soils meet monitoring water technique comments standards technique comments 1 ms 1 3 ms 1 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 No streams witin the sale are 1 ms 4 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 *See "summary observations 1 ms 1 1 ms 3 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 3 ms 1 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 3 ms 1 1 ms 1 3 One unit clearly meet soil 4 ms quality standards; one unit partially (1/3-1 Five of nine units monitored met forest plan and regional soil quality ms 1 3 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 1 ms 1
Page 9
monitoring_data
FS TC
10 1
FS
10
FS
10
FS FS
10 10
421 421 421 421 420 420 420 420 420 421 421 421 420 491 420 420 491 491 421 420 421 421 421 421 421 421 420 420 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 454 420 454 421 452 420 420 420 401 421 421 420 491 430 410 421
ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms dnms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms dnms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1
ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 The Forest Plan standard 1 ms requires that no more than 5% of the proj ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 Some soil compaction/displacement visually evident within unit, but ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 Contract requirements met, inspected and accepted ms 1 Hauling restricted April 15 - O ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 The forest plan standard for soil disturbance has not yet been met b ms 1 All standardsms met. All trails used All standards met. operation were 1 during the salvage No floodp ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1
Page 10
monitoring_data
FS
20
FS
10
TC FS FS TC FS
1 30 30 1 10
421 421 430 452 491 421 401 452 421 421 432 434 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 421 491 491 421 421 421 421 420 421 421
ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms
1 4 4 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms dnms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms dnms ms
1 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Forest S&G's State "low wate
Stream crossing material wa
Page 11
monitoring_data
TC
454 1 454 420 421
ms ms ms ms
1 1 1 1
ms ms ms ms
1 1 1 1
Page 12
monitoring_data
listed & listed & sensitive sensitive listed & listed & Air plants wildlife sensitive sensitive listed & does/not air does/not does/not plants wildlife sensitive meet monitoring air meet meet monitoring monitoring plants standards technique comments standards technique comments standards technique ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 4 ms 4 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 3 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 4 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 Met Montanams Quality Standards for None noted during analysis or operations. Air 1 this Airshed. ms 4 ms 1 N/A N/A ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 3 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 3 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 4 ms 1 ms 4 ms 4 ms 4 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 3 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 4 ms 1 ms 1 ms 4 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 3 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 N/A ms 3
Page 13
monitoring_data
ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 4 ms 1 Hauling restricted April 15 - Oct 15 ms 1 ms 1 ms 4 ms 4 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 4 ms 4 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 4 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1
ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 A few slash piles completed by Purchaser but not burned by Forest Service. ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 4 ms 4 Burn Plan complied with North Coast Air Quality Standards ms 1 ms 1 At this time burning of slash not complete, burn planmscompliance with North Coast Air Quality Stand ms 1 Know Sites flagged and avoided. No New sites located. in 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 4 ms 1 ms 4 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 All standardsms met. Since this project was salvage of No sensitive plants were found in necessary were 1 All standards ms fire killed timber, no burning was the salvag met. 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1
Page 14
monitoring_data
ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms
1 4 4 1 4 1 1 1 1 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms
1 4 4 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 4 4
ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms
1 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4
ms ms
4 4
ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms
1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 1 1 1 1
ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1
.
ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms
1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1
ms ms ms ms
1 1 1 1
Page 15
monitoring_data
ms ms ms ms
1 1 1 1
ms ms ms ms
1 1 1 1
ms ms ms ms
1 1 1 1
Page 16
monitoring_data
listed & sensitive listed & other other listed & fish sensitive listed & vegetation other wildlife sensitive does/not fish sensitive does/not vegetation other does/not wildlife meet monitoring fish meet monitoring vegetation meet comments standards technique comments standards technique comments standards ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 4 ms 4 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 2 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms None noted during analysis1or operations. ms None noted during analysis or operations. ms 1 ms N/A N/A ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 4 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 3 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms Noxious weed control ms ms 1 ms 1 No documentation in reference to noxious weed dnms ms 4 dnms 4 ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 3 ms ms 1 ms 3 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 3 ms ms 1 N/A ms 1 ms
Page 17
monitoring_data
ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 2 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms INFISH (FM-1) requires that fuels treatments be ms ms 1 dnms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 Decision wasms made prior to Regional Noxoius W ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 4 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms Snal level exceeds standards. LOP for Hauling restricted April 15 1 Oct 15 ms 1 Norther Spotted Owl met. ms ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 4 ms 1 ms ms 4 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms All standardsms met. The wildlife biologistAll standards mstheThere isconcurred with standardsms theDuring projecttemporary road 1 who monitored met. project no fish bearingthe determination in the BA/BENEPA review 1 All streams on met. project. The basically. Th ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 4 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms ms 1 ms 1 ms
Page 18
monitoring_data
ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms
1 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1
ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms
1 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3
ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms dnms
ms ms
4 4
ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms
1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4
ms ms
1 1
Page 19
monitoring_data
ms ms ms ms
1 1 1 1
ms ms ms ms
1 1 1 1
ms ms ms ms
Page 20
monitoring_data
cultural & other other fish historic cultural & wildlife other does/not other fish does/not historic cultural & monitoring wildlife meet monitoring other fish meet monitoring historic technique comments standards technique comments standards technique comments 1 ms 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 1 ms 4 ms 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 1 ms 4 ms 4 1 ms 4 ms 4 1 ms 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 ms 4 1 ms 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 4 ms 4 ms 1 Met with remaining timber stand density. applicable. ms 4 Not ms 1 Inventoried prior to operations. No cu 1 1 N/A ms 4 1 ms 1 ms 1 1 The area was burnt over after this sale teminated, in the Intermission fire of 1988, the area no longer provides hidi ms 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 ms 4 1 ms 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 ms 4 No indicationms osprey nest sites were considered. Did not address mitigation in elk calving areas. Biological ev that 4 ms 4 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 ms 4 1 ms 1 ms 4 1 ms 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 1 ms 1 N/A ms 3
Page 21
monitoring_data
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 Site not protected - per DM and SHPO ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 4 ms 1 ms 1 Purchaser fell and left hazard trees for Only historical site outside activity are ms 1 large woody debris in Summit Creek Down Woodyms Materil remaining exceeds standards. 1 ms 1 All known sites flagged and avoided, ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 4 ms 1 ms 4 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 All standardsms A slight concern is All standardsms of time that Ponderosa pine snags are remaining standing a met. 1 the short period met. 4 All standards met. A cultural resourc ms 1 ms 4 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 4 This project area was inventoried and ms 1 ms 4 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 1
Page 22
monitoring_data
1 4 4 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1
ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms
1 4 4 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1
ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms
1 4 4 1 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1
ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms
4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms ms
4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1
ms Requirement msretain to
1 1
Page 23
monitoring_data
1 1 1 1
ms ms ms ms
1 1 1 1
ms ms ms ms
1 1 1 1
Page 24
monitoring_data
other resource 1 does/not other meet resource 1 standards Visuals ms Visuals ms Visual Quality s m
other resource 2 other other other other resource 1 does/not resource 2 monitoring resource 1 monitoring resource 2 other meet technique comments resource 2 standards technique comments 1 1 1
Recreational Use ms
1
Fuels
ms
1
Fuels reduction ms fuels reduction ms
3 1
old growth/down woody fuels ms 3
Inventoried prior to operations. No cultural resources within the analysis area.ms ms 4 Not applicable. 4 Not applicable. Fuels - Fuelsms Reduction 3 Travel Management - Temporary Road Closures ms 1 4 Visuals ms 1 Public Safety s m 4
Range Improvments ms
1
Old Growth ms
3
Old Growth ms
1 N/A N/A
Page 25
monitoring_data
Fuels Fuels
ms ms
1 1
Visual Quality nms d
1
There are approx. 5 acres that are visible from FDR #113 that did not get expected aspe
ms
1
ms
1
RHCA
ms
1 1 1 1
Recreation ms Visual Quality s m Visual Quality s m
Site not protected - per DM and SHPO - railroad grade had been converted to a Forest Sytem Road.
snags and course wood 1 ms Only historical site outside activity area. All known sites flagged and avoided, except Buck Springs Campground which had controlled access monitored by Archeologist. Visual Quality ms 1
Roadside Hazards Removed ms 1
RHCAs ms RHCAs ms Public Safetyms Recreation/Visuals ms
1 1 1 1
Dedicated Old Growth ms Public Use ms
1 1
Soil Erosion ms Scenic ms
1 1
All standards Road No soil erosion was1observed on the unit or the on barriers built as pa met. closures ms Standards met road leading into the
This project area was inventoried and has no historic properties were located. The method of monitoring is "other", because no field monito ms 1
Page 26
monitoring_data
na Survey and Manage ms 1
na
noxious weeds ms Silviculture ms Silviculture ms Visuals ms Visuals ms undesirable understory ms undesirable understory ms
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Invasive weeds (scotch broom and himalayan blackberry) were found during post-sale v
w/l forage w/l forage
ms ms
1 1
Red-cockaded woodpecker ms 3
Visual Quality s m
1 1
visuals
dnms
1 1 1 1 4 4 1 1
Partial Retention Area. The amount of treatment area is larger than guidelines. This tre
Recreation GFA ms Recreation GFA ms Visual ms N/A N/A Visuals Visual ms ms ms ms
N/A N/A
ms ms
4 4
Visual ms Insect and Disease ms
1 1
Visual
ms
1
Page 27
monitoring_data
Karst ms Visual Quality s m Visual Quality s m
1 1 1
Page 28
monitoring_data
other resource 3 other did/did not does/not resource 3 other have other meet monitoring resource 3 - how project summary significant resource 3 standards technique comments was selected observations effects Selected as the This project wasdidnot DM signed reducing local tree mor most recent timber sale very successful in on the Plains/Thompso One DM issued This small one indidnotCoin toss. and incidental Along timbe in '98 and salvage of blowdown "Heads" was dying Haul '97. A fairly recent decision memo that was completed and fairly close to need w All resource objectives identified in the purpose and the Ra didnot DM was selected because it wasdidnot to town with easy access andmonito -other monitoring close technique used for TES plants for other Randomly selected from the 12 available CE sales. Picked the name from NA didnot Selected randomly from 12 available projects. Name picked from a hat. NA didnot Selected by reason of proximity to existing,aopen road, travel time, effective Site continues todidnot as demonstation area of and limi serve Selected as oneProject areasincludesaccessible from existing roads and av of two area readily roads and stands on highly sensitive didnot Decision was selected from roughly 30 CE's completed withinto 1999. The sensitive plant, peavine, occurring prior the project ar didnot This project was selected as it was originally done under a DM, withdrawn didnot From a list of applicable projects,was monitored by walking throughfrom har Soil disturbance didnot this project was easily accessed the ope This project wasSoil samples were taken from disturbed and undisturbed a easily accessed while other areas were under snow cover didnot Completed project was near the and dry. No observed soil erosion. ATV us Sites were high didnot age requirement, and easily access 4 year Decision Memo had been prepared and was ready to be issued at about tim didnot This project had multi-party monitoring report completed. didnot This is the only Decision MemoEvaluation for a project on the Custer using The Biological prepared called for monitoring of the proje didnot Not applicable. ms 4 Not applicable. 1996 was the most recently completed for this the roundwood program on t When CE's were used CE for type of harvest activities, no didnot Travel Management - Public Safety - Log Trucks This project wasMonitoring was sale on thethroughout the lifeWhite River N ms 1 the last timber performed East Zone of the of the project didnot This project wasThe orginal DM and rescinded due to the R8 Heartwood Ca orginally a salvage project was under contract to be harve didnot A list of Decision Memos was made, and each given a number. A random The sale firewood salvage in 1984. In 1988 the Interm didnot This sale was not randomly selected. withinsalearea that was first entered f This salvage sale fell This an was selected because it wa didnot NEPA/Monitoring staffregeneration (passed the 5-year exam); helped mee Good (Harrison) asked Laramie District timber staff for a li didnot NEPA/Monitoring staff (Harrison) asked Laramie District timber staff for a li This post and pole thinning unit provided a needed resourc didnot This sale is one See above.0 treatment sale that were originally covered un of two beetle didnot All past DM's were given a number, and two wereevent in 1993, which was The area had another blowdown selected using random n didnot The Forest did not have many projects that met the selection criteria.All mit All Forest Plan standards and guidelines were met. This didnot Visuals ms 1 The Supervisor's Office of this sale a small sale that was 1) prepared under Activity requested was non-impactive to all resources whe didnot The Supervisor's Office of this sale a small sale that was 1) prepared under Activity requested was non-impactive to all resources whe didnot One of the District field reviewsawlog salvage sales that wasspecialist. Mos A only small was conducted by the above done under the didnot Most recent activity that could meet the criteria for category 4 didnot Most recent activity that could meet the part of the category 4 Hwy Recons Action was included as criteria for North Fork didnot Districts were polled for woody debris presence and effective ground cover Coarse qualifying projects. Most activity was located on th didnot Districts were polled for qualifying projects. Most observation while walking All monitoring was conducted by activity was located on th didnot only one of two recently completed sales that met the category 4 criteria. didnot One of two recently completed sales meeting the category 4 criteria. didnot Made query of Rodkyharvested in winter with frozen/snow covered conditio Sale Mountain Resource Information System for commerc didnot Made query of Rocky Mountain Resource Information System database for No soil erosion, soil movement or sedimentation was obse didnot Project was recent and met the criteria that the Forest uses to categorically didnot Project was recent and met the criteria that the Forest uses to categorically didnot This sale was one of two sales offered, sold, and harvested on the Forest t didnot This sale was selected because didnot one of only two sales that could hav it was Project name drawn from asite walk Treatment hat containing names for eligible projects. didnot Project name drawn from asite walk-thru by monitoring team.projects. Treatment hat containing names for eligible didnot Each administrative unit was directed nature of the projects.(6This project is The extremely minor to monitor 2 harvest separate sale didnot Selected because of the limited timber related projects that haveID team th Conclusions based primarily on observations of taken plac didnot N/A The DM was notThe treatment has produced the anticipated results, is con randomly selected. Although this is a wildlife driven proje didnot
Page 29
monitoring_data
This was the only recent project completed on the district that would have m The project was didnot associated with logs harvested during fire This was the only DM* on BMP'sdidnot met mitigated soil and water conc Identified the District that successfully the criteria. The selection was made of a little snow on the that fit this category, were im There was the only two sales ground the day we monitore didnot The selection was made of a little snow on the that fit this category, were im There was the only two sales ground the day we monitore didnot Names were placed in a hat andarea has Candidate sales on the Forest we Soils - The sale didnot - healed well drawn Names were placed in a hat andarea has Candidate sales on the Forest we Soils - The sale didnot - healed well drawn R #113 that did not get expected aspen rejuvenation. This area does not meet the "foreground partial retention" standard. Had aspen regen The selection was made at the Forest Supervisor's office. didnot Two Districts submitted three projects. The team visited the District with tw Members of the didnot monitoring believe an additinal quest Two Districts submitted three projects. We team believe an additional que Members of the didnot monitoring visited the District with two proj This project was originally categorically excluded, then an EA and DN prep didnot ms 1 Randonly selected among fairly recent sales didnot Randonly selected among fairly recent sales didnot Projects from past 4 years selected and grouped into two purpose offor the Project was designed to create and improve habitat harve didnot Projects from past 4 years selected and grouped into two purpose of harve Project designed to commercially thin a ponderosa pine sta didnot WE wanted to monitor this type of project in conjunction with another proje didnot Proximity to other monitoring projects, easy access didnot Eighteen qualifying sales that had been completed since 1995 were assign didnot Eighteen qualifying sales that had been completed since 1995 were assign didnot Five sales on August was a reply.didnot This 22nd projectRandom numbers used to select two. ro to remove hazard trees along system Of 4 Category 4 This sale was terminated early,the NOrth Sone of the Sierr Decision Memos produced on uncompleted, per Regiona didnot Five sales on August project wasdidnot This 22nd reply. aRandom numbers used towith a few com pre-commercial thinning select two. It was the only DM on the Forestdidnot completedstandards and guidelines Resources indicated above meet activity. with a Picked random number of 12 numbered project on Trinity National Forest Monitoring occurred during contract administration. All con didnot onitored by Archeologist. Picked Random Monitoringof 12 Numbered projects on Trinity National Fore Numbers occurred during contract administration. All con didnot The Forest had three sales with records available for reviewing operated by didnot The Forest had three sales which had records available for review didnot District Planning Officers provided names of projects that met the category didnot This project was selected on the didnot of having been monitored previous t basis This Decision Memo was the only one we had on the Forest. Objectives were didnot met The names of qualifying sales were written on slips of paper and placed in SOILS & WATERidnot d The names of qualifyingwas removalwritten on slips of paper. The slips we Project sales were of wind didnot Two of the five TNF Decision Memos were drawn out of a hat. didnot Two of the five TNF sales were selected out of a hat. didnot This was the on DM category 4 on the forest didnot One of two selectedor low a list by a person not familiar with the CE projects No from impacts to soils because skidding occurred over didnot one of two selected by a person didnot along road system Scattered tree removal not familiar with the CE project list. Selected with a hand draw from kettle with paper slips of each eligible proje N/A didnot N/A District had three recentmet objectives in taking care listed. One of the proje Project DM's that fit into the criteria of a blowdown situatio didnot Project was randomly selected. didnototherprojects meeting criteria (4 total 454-logging method - of - primary objective of sale was Names Not randomly selected. This was the only sale we had available which had didnot The Clackamas The monitoring team field visited theselected by the Forest River Ranger District was randomly project. The team loo didnot The Clackamas The monitoring team visited the project on the ground. The River Ranger District was randomly selected by the Forest didnot Standards met on barriers built as part of the sale. There seemsThe Decision Memoaccess into this Forest Plan Standards pure Guidelines to be some vehicle was selected based on it was the last andprivate land This project met didnot off a road located on timber sale all area Random number generator didnot random numberLow impact recreation hazard reduction project in disperse generator didnot First on shelf with logging all applicable Forest Plan standards and guideline Sale met activity competed. didnot Second EA/DN notice on shelf with harvest activity Plan standards and guid Project was consistent with Forest competed. didnot ng is "other", because no field monitoring is required by CFR when no historic properties are Sale was selected The Wash Creek Salvage present didnot The decision memo was randomly selected from a group of seven timber h The 25-acre harvest removed pole size didnot We only did 2 CEs for removal of treesof removing 900 trees which were n This project consisted in orchards didnot We have completed only 2 CEs for removal of trees in an administrative sit All resource protection measures were acheieved. didnot Cispus HTR Thin was substituted for a randomly selected project because didnot
Page 30
monitoring_data
This project was randomly selected from a pool of six projects submitted by didnot This sale is one na two available didnotselected. Therefore, this cannot be c of to be There were only two projects on didnot the Forest that fit this category Only CE-4 type project on District with implementation completed. bucke Field visits and obsevation of sites where trees were didnot The decision memo was randomly selected from a Spout of three Recreati The sale is located adjacent to the group Springs timber ha didnot Per Forest requirement in 1996, didnot monitoring included Forest Plan implemen Names of timber saleson abovecriteria (3) for forest wereHarvest-consisted Notes meeting didnot selections : 240 Special put in hat, person All FY 1995 through FY 2001 it was which either were CatEx under sites fro The fact that sales very difficult to even locate the Categor didnot All FY 1995 through FY 2001 sales which either were CatEx under Categor This was a blowdown salvage operation in a previously thin didnot This project was selected by the didnot Planning Staff Officer from a list of Forest Two projects were selected that didnot relatively in the field. In most case Units 5,6,7,9 and 10 were visited close proximity to allow e were in kberry) were found during post-sale visits to the sale area. It is not clear that there is a cause and2, 3 of its4 (11 harvestanotherwere visited o Taft salvage was selected because and proximity to units) the weeds and Subdivisions 1, didnot relationship between small savage effect This project wasTwo special areasDN the bug spot were designatedinvolved covered under a in and was selected because it for avo didnot Randomly selected by lottery. didnot salvage removal of wind-damaged t Project monitored was Selected by lottery. Project was first didnot of pine plantation. ID Team of res thinning This sale was the only one of weretype fitting the category forcompleted and All sale units this visited after the sale was the time perio didnot Listed all completed Category 4 decisions from 1996 and 1997 since later y didnot Listed all completed Category 4 decisions from 1996 and 1997 since later y didnot Only active DM timber sale on forest Sixty Five acres didnot of mature and immature oak most recent closed DM timber sale acres of a pine/hardwood stand to impr Decision to thin 70 didnot District had six DMs to choose from. The were formed by blocked dips (co Several ephemeral pools SO asked to look at two sales th didnot District had six DM to choose from. with no bare spotsreview those that had Good ground cover The SO asked to or soil erosion didnot Pulled out the first addition to fit the category ofmet, the1996 completed Cat In folder that standards being a post botanist and biologi didnot This project wasThirteen acres of shortleaf pine were commercially thinned selected because it represented a typical shortleaf pine th didnot SPB sites were grouped bya locally rare plant, waswildlife, archeological). S Nestronia, site needs (soil/water, flagged and marked on didnot This project wasOne-half acre ofdidnot and/or insecttypical insect infestation selected because it represented a infested trees were ha dead SPB sites were grouped bya locally rare plant, waswildlife, archeological). S Nestronia, site needs (soil/water, flagged and marked on didnot Project was typical of large was conducted at mulitple levels. Much of the d Monitoring single event tornado damage which occurrs ran didnot One of only 3 onNo detrimental impactdesignated period. the Forest during the or effect on the ground....visual obs did not One of 3 on the Forest during this period. did not This unit is one of six harvest selected in 1997 for pre and post harvest mo didnot This unit is one of six cutting methods selected in 1997 for pre and post ha didnot This unit is one of six cutting methods selected in 1997 for pre and post ha didnot Numbered slips of paper representing the eligibile DMs were placed in a pa didnot Numbered slips This sale, which didnotthein removal of less than 3 CCF of of paper representing resulted eligibile DMs were placed in a pa The Forest asked the Districts for examples of during numerous field visits Monitoring was accomplished projects where the Category didnot The Forest asked the Districts for examples of during field visits byCategory Monitoring was accomplished projects where the various didnot rea is larger than guidelines. This treatment was proposed as a result of a the two projectsflattenedtohalf of the stand that areabeenbeen pre Selected windstorm that closest a the May 5, 1999 date. None of the sal Approximately one jack pine treatment had has thinned. didnot This project wasRealproject with didnot the good thining operation. Real nice looking5, 1999of red a decision closest to the May stand date Very few projects that meet the criteria needed exist on the forest. These tw Soil is deep well didnot till drained There has been No streams within project area little harvesting done under Decision Memos on the White didnot Selected becuase there were only two Category 4 projects on the Forest in didnot This was originally thought to have met the volume requirements for Categ didnot Most recent Category 4 project with a decision date prior significant1999. o Individually or cumulatively there was no to May 5, effect didnot N/A ms 4 N/A ms 4 Nearest project with a decsion cumulatevelyMay 5,wasw no significant effec Individually or date prior to there 1999. didnot Selected from a Very Good results over all. in the nineties that had monitor group of DM projects done Good performance from logger didnot Project was selected from a pooldidnotGreat aspen regeneration that thatus Great results overall. projects done in the nineties we h of DM 100% sample. Only 2 projects meeting Categorystandards and guidelines Monitoring Team concluded that 4 requirements have bee didnot 100% sample. Only 2 projects meeting Categorystandards and guidelines Monitoring Team concluded that 4 requirements have bee didnot Latest (only) 31.2 #4 areaprior to didnot This DM was composed of 05/05/1999. This sale was the last sale whichdidnot was implemented under a DM. This was one of three DM that was prepared under the salvage rider. This didnot na
Page 31
monitoring_data
One of two salvage sales that have closed first. didnot One of two salvage sales that have closed first. didnot This proposal met the requirements of 31.2 #4 for a categorical exclusion. Sale was loggeddidnot the winter time over about 4 feet o during This proposed harvest area met didnot The sale was winter requirements for aof the #4 categorical the logged and much 31.2 stand is still a
Page 32
monitoring_data
should be categorically rationale for data excluded categorical data entry entry y/n exclusion person date line officer email Lisa Krueger, District Ranger Y The Affected Environment and Proposed Action for addressing resource issues were sim Mike Ablutzmablutz@fs.fed.us 9/19/2001 Steve Kozel, District Ranger, Bonners Because there were no extraordinary circumstances involved in removing the products fo Y Ferry Ranger District Wynsma Barry bwynsma@fs.fed.us 10/2/2001 George Bain, District ranger, St. Joe Ranger were no extraordinary circumstances invovled in removing the product for human Y There District kimberly johnson kjohnson02@fs.fed.us 10/18/2001 Joseph P. Stringer, District Ranger, Coeur d'Alene River Ranger Districtthe conditions, location, and lack of extraordinary circum Y Projects of this magnitude, rrehnborg@fs.fed.us Bob Rehnborg given 10/26/2001 Larry Dawson Forest Supervisor Y The sale required no Keersemaker John new road construction, Infish buffers were used and met and the pr jkeersemaker@fs.fed.us 10/29/2001 Larry Dawson Forest Supervisor Y There was no new road construction, Infish buffers were utilized and the project met all F John Keersemaker jkeersemaker@fs.fed.us 10/29/2001 Tim Hancock, Supervisory Forester, Leader - Forest EcologyCassani Y Project area does not involve any sensitive areas (riparian, wetland, soils) so no or very m Steve Group scassani@fs.fed.us 10/31/2001 Tim Hancock, Supervisory Forester, Gallatin Forest Ecology Cassanito disturbance were known at the time of the decision; the Y Soil conditions and sensitivity Steve Group scassani@fs.fed.us 1/31/2001 Edward C. Monnig, District Ranger, Fortine project meets all 10 criteria listed under 40 CFR 1508.27 with no extraordinary circu Y This District Edward C. Monnig emonnig@fs.fed.us 10/31/2001 Brian Avery, District Ranger, Cabinet Ranger District Brian Averybavery@fs.fed.usunder 40 CFR 1508.27. There were no extr Y The project meets all 10 requirements 10/31/2001 listed William A. Fortune, District Ranger Y The setting for this project and the proposed treatment for addressing resource issues w Steve Martinjmartin@fs.fed.us s 10/31/2001 William A. Fortune, District Ranger Y Eventhough thisSteve Martinjmartin@fs.fed.us the effects are no different than those p project covered over 140 acres, s 10/31/2001 Bob Gilman, District Ranger Y Because there were no extraordinary circumstances that would drive this project to an E bgilman bgilman@fs.fed.us 11/1/2001 Jane Kollmeyer, DistrictYRanger The District Ranger determined this project would not have significant efects, supported Gary Dahlgren gdahlgren@fs.fed.us 11/1/2001 The scoping, analysis, and gdahlgren@fs.fed.us no significant effects would occur by im Gary Dahlgren monitroing determined 11/1/2001 Jimmy DeHerrera Y Larry Timchak, Deputy Y Forest Supervisor project area does not involve any sensitive areas (no permanent lakes or streams in The Mark Slacks slacks@fs.fed.us m 11/1/2001 Von Helmuth, District Ranger Y Objectives of the sales were met on the ground, no negative comments from interested p Bob Johns RJohns@fs.fed.us 11/7/2001 Anne E. Huebner, District Ranger Y Based on the environmental analysis for the project and past experience, the effects of im Ken Cunning kcunning@fs.fed.us 10/19/2001 F.William Hahnenberg, Y District RangerThe project wasCary Greencgreen@fs.fed.usin an area that had previous EA's completed small in scale and occurred 10/19/2001 Dave Myers, Medicine Wheel/Paintrock District Ranger and duration of the10/23/2001 such that there was no significant eff Y The level, intensity, Thomas Chris cthomas@fs.fed.uswas project Jo Bridges, District Ranger Y The scattered nature ofB Hartvigsen 10/24/2001 Steven thesbhartvigsen@fs.fed.us and resultant harvesting activities w salvaged/included timber Mike Sanders, District Ranger, Laramie District Y This project metPatrick Harrison, NEPA/Monitoring Specialist exclusion at the time it was the quidelines for a "category 4" categorical plharrison@fs.fed.us 10/24/2001 Mike Sanders, District Ranger, Laramie District limitedPatrick Harrison - NEPA/Monitoring Specialista low order of significance Y The very context and intensity of this project results in plharrison@fs.fed.us 10/24/2001 Sam Schroeder, Resource Staff/Forester sale was held up from SSchroeder@fs.fed.us Heartwood case. A new EA was com Y This Sam Schroeder because of the cutting 10/24/2001 Dave Myers, Medicine Wheel/Paintrock District Ranger Y The extent, intensity, duration we such 10/24/2001 Chris Thomas cthomas@fs.fed.us were no significant effects on the huma that there Tom Goodwin, District Ranger Y This sale could have been implemented using a CE under the old guidelines but likely wo John Murphy John R Murphy/R2/USDAFS@FSNOTES 10/26/2001 James C. Free, District Y Ranger The criteria in 40 CFR 1508.27 were met, the policy in FSH 1909.15, Section 30.3 were m Kenneth A. keanderson@fs.fed.us Anderson 10/31/2001 James C. Free, District Y Ranger The criteria in 40 CFR 1508.27 were met, the policy in FSH 1909.15, Section 30.3 were m Kenneth A. keanderson@fs.fed.us Anderson 10/31/2001 Randall Burgess, District Ranger, Divide Ranger District small intensity and 10/31/2001in that it harvested approximately 160 Y This project was of Self kself@fs.fed.us Kirby complexity Brent Larson, District Ranger Y There were no extraordinary circumstances involved and resource effects were success Bryan Armel barmel@fs.fed.us 10/31/2001 Brent Larson, District Ranger Y No extraordinary circumstances were involved. Standard practices such as BMPs and ti Bryan Armel barmel@fs.fed.us 10/31/2001 John C. Twiss, Forest Supervisor Y This project was clearly J. Fischerscope and intensity, and routine in nature. The project Edward of limited efischer@fs.fed.us 11/1/2001 John C. Twiss, Forest Supervisor Y This project was unquestionably of very limited scope and intensity, and met Forest Plan Edward Fischer efischer@fs.fed.us 11/1/2001 Michael W. Foley for James Bedwell, Forest Supervisor met the category 4 criteria. This was not a controversial project becau Y This sale certainly Michael W. mfoley@fs.fed.us Foley 11/1/2001 Michael W. Foley for James Bedwell, Forest Supervisor extrordinary circumstances and met the category 4 criteria. Y This project hadMichael W. mfoley@fs.fed.us no Foley 11/01/2001 Kurt L. Winchester/District Ranger Y Based on monitoring observation the project was successfull in attaining the goals and o Timothy L. Fruits tfruits@fs.fed.us 10/19/2001 Kurt L. Winchester/District Ranger Y This harvest project wasL. Fruits Timothy categorically excluded using category tfruits@fs.fed.us 10/19/2001 Frank R. Martinez District Ranger Y There were no significant issues scoped initially as well as any which emerged based up Dennis M. Watson dmwatson@fs.fed.us 10/22/2001 Frank R. Martinez District Ranger Y There were no significant issues scoped initially as well as any which emerged based up Dennis M. Watson dmwatson@fs.fed.us 10/22/2001 Ed Armenta, District Ranger Y This project was catagorically exlcuded based upon FSH1909.15, Section 31.1b-4, repai James A. Mercer jmercer@fs.fed.us 10/23/2001 Ed Armenta, District Ranger Y This project could haveA. Mercer James been catagorically excluded based upon the volume involved and jmercer@fs.fed.us 10/24/2001 John Bedell, Forest Supervisor Y This project was an understory treatment to abate fire risk around the Ranger Station an Doug Beal dbeal01@fs.fed.us 10/27/2001 John Bedell, Forest Supervisor Y This project was an understory treatment for fuels abatement around one part of the com Doug Beal dbeal01@fs.fed.us 10-27-2001 Pat Morrison, Acting District Ranger Minor, scattered harvest of Pat Morrison/R3/USDAFS@FSNOTES wildlife and other re Y Pat Morrison trees within10/30/2001 specific limitations to protect Gerald A. Engel, Silver Y District Ranger City Monitoring indicated very limited impacts on the environment. Threatened and endange Gerry Engel engel@fs.fed.us g 10/30/2001 Chuck Hagerdon, District Ranger Y This project is small in Hagerdon Chuck scope, limited treatment with no road construction, no resource i chagerdon@fs.fed.us 10/31/2001
Page 33
monitoring_data
Gene Waldrip District Ranger Y There were no significant effects to the11/6/2001 Kim Newbauer knewbauer@fs.fed.us human environment including all related resource Larry G. Sears, District Y Ranger The timber harvest was part of a soil and water improvement project. The soil and water Dan derrickdderrick/r3_coconino@fs.fed.us 11/7/2001 Mary Erickson, Forest Supervisor Y The impacts were clearly not significant. However, it is not clear if the harvest type of "sa Mary Erickson mcerickson10/22/2001 The impacts were clearly not significant. However, it is not clear if the harvest type of "sa Mary Erickson mcerickson10/22/2001 Mary Erickson Y Elaine Zieroth, Forest Supervisor N This sale was one of several in the area covered under one EA. The entire scope of the Donald Fullmer dfullmer@fs.fed.us 10/23/2001 Elaine Zieroth, Forest Supervisor N This sale was one of several in the area covered under one EA. The entire scope of the Donald Fullmer dfullmer@fs.fed.us 10/23/2001 Larry Tripp, District Ranger Y Both beneficial and adverse effects were minor Jane Beaulieu jbeaulieu@fs.fed.us 10/24/2001 Dennis Duehren, District Ranger Y The analysis identified no extraordinary circumstances that might cause the action to hav Dennis Duehren dduehren/r4_Caribou@fs.fed.us 10/24/2001 Dennis Duehren, District Ranger Y The analysis did not identify any extraordinary circumstances that might cause the action Bruce Padian BPadian/r4/USDAFS@FSnotes 10/24/2001 Ronnie F. Julian, Cascade District Ranger, monitoring Michaelidentify any individually or cumulatively significant adverse short o Y The Boise Nationalnot K. Dimmett Dimmett/R4/USDAFS@FSNOTES did Forest Michael 10/24/2001 Brad Exton, Vernal District Ranger Y small scale project with nominal, predictable effects Brad Exton bexton@fs.fed.us 10/26/2001 Brad Exton, Vernal District Ranger Y small scale project with nominal, predictable effects Brad Exton bexton@fs.fed.us 10/26/2001 John Baglien, District Ranger, Weiser Ranger District Ted Demetriades Y This project was categorically excluded because it was designed in cooperation with US tdemetri@fs.fed.us 10/30/2001 Faye L. Krueger, District Ranger, Council Ranger District Demetriades Y Calamity TS was designed tdemetri@fs.fed.us unit. Skid trails were developed and ex Ted as a seed production 10/30/2001 Deborah Johnson - Ranger - Logan Ranger District Julie Hubbard excellect scoping and response to few issues raised. Y Negligible effects, very limited, jhubbard@fs.fed.us 11/1/2001 Ruth Monahan - OgdenY District Ranger Limited effects and no significant issues Julie Hubbard jhubbard@fs.fed.us 11/2/2001 Gary Bilyeu, District Ranger - Pacific Ranger District Tim Dabney Y This project was similar in scope, duration, and magnitude to past projects where no sign tdabney@fs.fed.us 10/22/2001 Gary Bilyeu, District Ranger - Pacific Ranger District Tim Dabney Y This project was similar in scope, duration, and magnitude to past projects where no sign tdabney@fs.fed.us 10/22/2001 Jerome Caston, DistrictY Ranger This project hadDavidto no effect on the environment and removed hazardous trees that little C. Stone dstone@fs.fed.us 10/26/2001 David W. Martin, District Ranger Y This Project was similar Price Michael in scope, duration, size, and magnitude, to many past projects w mjprice@fs.fed.us 10/29/2001 Teri Simon-Jackson, District Ranger This project hadDavidto no effect on the environment, it removed fuel ladders and treated Y little C. Stone dstone@fs.fed.gov 10/31/2001 District Ranger Thomas W. Farmer Yes. The monitoring and nature of the 10/31/2001 Y Jim Lucido jlucido@fs.fed.us indicates this project fits the scope and in project Donna F. Harmon, District Ranger Y Power company identified trees that were a potential hazard to transmission lines. Volum Stan Stetsonstetson@fs.fed.us s 10/31/2001 Donna F. Harmon, District Ranger N Continued mortatilty caused stetson@fs.fed.us exceed estimated 1000 mbf. Heartwoo Stan Stetsonvolume removed to s 10-31-2001 Susan Jeheber-Matthews District Ranger project metJoe Waddellfound in FSH Y This the criteriajwaddell@fs.fed.us 10/31/2001 Susan Jeheber-Matthews District Ranger project metJoe Waddellfound in FSH 1909.15, Section 31, Categories of Actions Ex Y This the criteriajwaddell@fs.fed.us 10-31-2001 Blaine Baker, Upper Lake & Covelo District project salvagedVan Dame, Forest Planner or otherwise wind damaged timber. The Y This Ranger Mike blown-down and 10/31/2001 mvandame@fs.fed.us snap-top Blaine Baker, Upper Lake & Covelo District project salvagedVan Dame and 10-31-2000 otherwise severely wind-damaged tim Y This Ranger Mike blown-down mvandame@fs.fed.us snap-top or Del Pengilly, District Ranger, Tule River/Hot Springsprojects, Districts roadside hazard trees, have minimal impact to the ground Y Small timber Ranger suchbxjohnston@fs.fed.us Barbara Johnston as 11/1/2001 Ben L. del Villar, ForestY Supervisor Any adverse effects were Palmer Most 11/5/2001 were not affected. The beneficial effec Aileen M. minor. M Palmer/R5/USDAFS@FSNOTES Aileen resources Ben L. del Villar, ForestY Supervisor Any adverse effects were Palmer Most 11/5/2001 were not affected. All standards and g Aileen M. minor. M Palmer/R5/USDAFS@FSNOTES Aileen resources Jean M. Masquelier, District Ranger Removal of dead and Lee Brown trees within falling distance of forest roads did not ha Y Linda dyingllbrown@fs.fed.us hazard 11/6/2001 Jean M. Masquelier, District Ranger Removal of dead and Lee Brown trees within falling distance of forest roads did not ha Y Linda dyingllbrown@fs.fed.us hazard 11/6/2001 Bernie Weisgerber, District Ranger A simple recurring activity with fewWeisgerber@fs.fed.us Y Bernie Weisgerber resource issues Bernie 11/7/2001 Louis Provencher, Acting District Ranger volume removal Westlund Acting Forest Planner Y Low Glen gwestlund 10/11/2001 Louis Provencher Acting District Ranger impact project removing scattered10/11/2001 Y Low Glen Westlund Acting trees. Removal was not concentrated in one are gwestlund Forest Planner Randall D. Shepard, District Ranger Yes, 410 Salvage is a prime example of a project that should be eligible for selection und Y Randall D. Shepard 10/11/2001 rdshepard@fs.fed.us Sherri K. Schwenke, District Ranger, Three Rivers Ranger District, Colville National Environamental documentation and analys Y Project did not constitute a wpawley@fs.fed.us Tom Pawley significant action. Forest, R6 10/12/2001 Arthur J. Currier, District Ranger, Lookout Mt. Ranger District, human environment were limited in scope and not significant. Th Y Because effectsGery Ferguson NF 10/16/2001 on the Ochoco gferguson@fs.fed.us Nancy Rose, Ecosystems Staff OfficerThis was a roadside hazardbcasey@fs.fed.us along several miles of highly traveled state Y Bruce Lee Caseyremoval sale tree 10/19/2001 Jeff P. Walter, Clackamas River District Ranger was designed to remove windthrown and hazardous trees along a major For Y This project James R Rice jrrice@fs.fed.us 10/23/2001 Jeff P. Walter, Clackamas River District Ranger was appropriate for a CE because it was only 3 acres in size, was designed Y This project James R Rice jrrice@fs.fed.us 10/23/2001 Mark S. Morris, Tonasket District Ranger Y Based on NEPA and monitoring review10/24/2001 Phillip Christy pchristy@fs.fed.us project there were no extraordinary circum of this Jack B. Sheehan Acting Deputy Forest Supervisor Jack B. Sheehan Y Minimum impact to all on-the-ground resources. Wildlife resource enhanced as well as p jsheehan@fs.fed.us 10/25/2001 Jack B. Sheehan Acting Deputy Forest Supervisor observations above. 10/26/2001 Y See Summary Jack B. Sheehan jsheehan@fs.fed.us Terri Jones acting for Rick Scott, District Ranger, Middle Fork RD nforrester@fs.fed.us public and/or administrative use, in a ma Y The removal of Neal Forrester roads open to down trees along 10/26/2001 Terri Jones, acting for Rick Scott, District Ranger, Middle Fork RDnforrester@fs.fed.us and/or administrative use has been a c Y Removing downNeal Forrester trees along roads open to public 10/26/2001 Carol Boyd, District Ranger Y Limited size and complexitytmevans@fs.fed.useffects on the human environment. Timothy Malcolm Evans of project, 10/27/2001 and no Craig Smith-Dixon, District Ranger Y In the initial analysis for the dherr@fs.fed.us David S. Herr Miners A Post and Pole Area timber sale I determined there 10/29/2001 Mary Zuschlag Y It was determined that this project occured in an administrative site, had no effects on th Mary Zuschlag mzuschlag@fs.fed.us 10/30/2001 Mary Zuschlag Natural Y Resources Staff officer Siuslaw NFno impact to listed 10/30/2001 all resources could be satisfactorily p Because there was Zuschlag Mary mzuschlag@fs.fed.us species and Harry Cody, District Ranger Y There are no extraordinary jcircumstances associated with this project. The context of en John Roland roland@fs.fed.us 10/30/2001
Page 34
monitoring_data
Harry Cody, District Ranger Y There are no extraordinary jcircumstances associated with this project. The context of en John Roland roland@fs.fed.us 10/30/2001 Rudolph V. Edwards/Snoqualmie District Ranger scale are extremely small and disturbance was very limited. Salvage operatio Y Scope and Steven L. Johnson rvedwards@fs.fed.us 10/30/2001 Rudolph V. Edwards, Jr. District Ranger, Snoqualmieextraordinary circumstances related to this project no public opposition an Y There were no Doug Schrenk Ranger District dschrenk@fs.fed.us 10/30/2001 Monty Wilson acting forY John P Allen, District Ranger, Neal Forrester RD. 10/30/2001 This type of project has minimal environmental impacts since it occurs almost exclusivel McKenzie River nforrester@fs.fed.us Mary Gibson, District Ranger Y From the initial analysis for dherr@fs.fed.us David S. Herr Spouter10/31/2001 the Salvage Timber Sale I determined there were no Deborah G. schmidt District Ranger Minimal effects Dee Hines & BobT&E spp., bcrisler@fs.fed.us Y to resources; no Crisler dhines@fs.fed.us 10/31/2001 Walter C. Schloer, Jr. Bend / Ft. RockAll standards & Gery Ferguson met on10/31/2001 Y Ranger District, Deschutes NF guidelines were gferguson@fs.fed.us Effects were limited in scope to the loca ground. Verne Farrell, Acting District Ranger, Pacific Ranger the proposal (removal of 10/31/2001 Y The nature of District Hoffman Ward whoffman@fs.fed.us trees blown down across system roads scattered Verne Farrell, Acting District Ranger, Pacific Ranger the proposal (removal of 10/31/2001from a previously thinned stand using e Y The nature of District Hoffman Ward whoffman@fs.fed.us blowdown David C. Schmitt, District Ranger Y This project was categorically excluded because it met the criteria listed in FSH1909.15, James M. Young M Young/R6/USDAFS@FSNOTES James 11/1/2001 Mike Hupp, Acting for Richard Sowa Environmental consequences of project on the ground were so minimal that it difficult to Y Mike Hupp mhupp@fs.fed.us 11/06/2001 Mike Hupp, Acting for Richard Sowa, Forest Supervisor itHupp difficult to even find where harvest activity had occurred. Whe Y In most of the units, was mhupp@fs.fed.us Mike 11/7/2001 Ron Smith (Acting District Ranger) Y Since we did not have aSmith Ronald Category 4, an EA had to be prepared for suppression of SPB fo ronaldasmith@fs.fed.us 10/1/2001 Lynn Neff, Forest Supervisor - KNF This project meets Lynn Neff and letter 10/22/2001 for item #4. This was a routine sal Y /s/ the intent lneff@fs.fed.us of orginal CE Lynn Neff, Forest Supervisor - KNF This project meets Lynn Neff and letter 10/22/2001 CE #4. This was a routine project, Y /s/ the intent lneff@fs.fed.us original of the Andy Colaninno, District Ranger Y Very low volume per acre was harvested. Land was level and well-drained. The action p Richard Shelfer rshelfer@fs.fed.us 10/22/2001 Stephen A. Parsons/District Ranger Because 1) I’ve looked at this project area’s environmental conditions an Y David T. Plunkett dplunkett/R8/USDAFS@FSNOTES 10/25/2001 Cynthia Holland/DistrictY Ranger Because furtherDavid T. Plunkett a Decision Memo is not warranted to establish the fact analysis beyond dplunktt/R8/USDAFS@FSNOTES 10/25/2001 Anne J. Zimmermann, Forest Supervisor project is routine in nature and will10/26/2001in singificant effects to either the physc Y This Sam Brocato sbrocato@fs.fed.us not result Anne J. Zimmermann, Forest Supervisor project was routine in nature and did not result in significant effects to either the phy Y This Sam Brocato sbrocato@fs.fed.us 10/26/2001 /s/ Beth LeMaster, District Ranger Y Project effects are what were expected10/29/2001 Jim Knibbs jknibbs@fs.fed.usthis type of operation. This is based on mo from /s/ Beth LeMaster, District Ranger Y Based on past experience with this type of project the resultant effects were anticipated. Jim Knibbs jknibbs@fs.fed.us 10/29/2001 Jim Thorsen, District Ranger on Seminole Ranger District, Ocalasuccessfully 10/30/2001 through our scoping and analysis of r Y Mitigation measures were National Forest Janet Hinchee jhinchee@fs.fed.us and applied Rob Kopack, Deputy District Ranger This project metVickiintent and letter of 10/30/2001 Categorical Exclusion #4. This was a Y the Weindel vweindel@fs.fed.us the original Glen Gaines - District Ranger - Bankhead RD, Bankhead acres and len Gaines@fs.fed.us overall low complexity. Project invo Y This project was 2 NF Glen Gaines considered to have an G 10/30/2001 Rob Kopack, Deputy District Ranger This project metVickiintent and letter of 10/30/2001 Categorical Exclusion #4. This was a Y the Weindel vweindel@fs.fed.us the original Glen Gaines - Bankhead Ranger District - Bankhead NF acres and len Gaines@fs.fed.us overall low complexity. Project involv Y This project was 6 Gaines considered to have a Glen G 10/30/2001 Gary W. Bennett, District Ranger, Homochitto Ranger GaryMISNational Forests in Mississippi direct and indirect monitoring sho Y Both land and water W. Bennett were 10/30/2001 and District, species gwbennett@fs.fed.us maintained David W. Jensen, District Ranger Tallulah Ranger District M. Ellis, Natural Resources Staffroads and only scattered trees that Y Involved a very small area within 100 feet of existing Officer Ray rmellis@fs.fed.us 10/31/2001 David W. Jensen, District Ranger Tallulah Ranger District small pockets (average of 2Staff Officer size) of blow down timber t Y One of a number of M Ellis,rmellis@fs.fed.us Ray Natural Resources to 5 acres in 10/31/2001 Ronnie Raum, Forest Supervisor Y Impacts were local and minimal. There were no unusual circumstances and the project Don Phillipsdephillips@fs.fed.us 10/31/2001 Ronnie Raum, Forest Supervisor Y Impacts were local and minimal. There were no unusual circumstances and the project Don Phillipsdephillips@fs.fed.us 10/31/2001 Ronnie Raum, Forest Supervisor Y Impacts were local and minimal. There were no unusual circumstances. While even-ag Don Phillipsdephillips@fs.fed.us 10/31/2001 Robert Raines, District Ranger, Womble Ranger District significant effects on soil, water, T&E species, cultural resources or a Y This activity hadRobert Raines no raraines@fs.fed.us 10/31/2001 Doug Webb, District Ranger, Cold Springs Ranger hadBill Pell Y This activity District significant effects on soil, water, T&E species, cultural resources or a no bpell@fs.fed.us 10/31/2001 Paul Bradley, District Ranger Y Use of a CE and DM allowed us to respond to a disease that was killing trees, and allowe Lawrence W. Hayden 11/1/2001 lhayden@fs.fed.us John F. Ramey, Forest Y Supervisor Use of a CE and DM allowed us to complete the shelterwood prescription that was descr Lawrence W. Hayden 11/1/2001 lhayden@fs.fed.us Fredrick A. Pick, Blackduck District Ranger Y Categorical exclusion Matson important for the quick salvage of this stand that blew do Norm was very nmatson 10/25/2001 Fredrick A. Pick, Blackduck District Ranger was estimated atMatson and 60 acres for scoping and DM. The sale area was re Y Sale Norm 100 MBF nmatson 10/25/2001 John Serfass District Ranger Y The project readily met the fhagan@fs.fed.us to be excluded from documentation in an Frank E. Hagan established criteria 10/29/2001 Terry Miller District Ranger Y The project readily met the fhagan@fs.fed.us that could be excluded from documentatio Frank E. Hagan for actions criteria 10/29/2001 James Schuler, Forest Y Supervisor Public health and safety from fire and insect hazards and visual impacts to a major State Larry Throop lthroop@fs.fed.us 10/29/2001 James Schuler, Forest Y Supevisor This project is aLarry Throop of an ongoing red pine basal area study conducted by North continuation lthroop@fs.fed.us 10/29/2001 Robert M. Walker, District Ranger Y It has been determinedPuro interdisciplinary team that there are no extraordinary circu Duane by the dpuro@fs.fed.us 10/31/2001 Robert M. Walker, District Ranger Y It has been determinedPuro interdisciplinary team that there are no extraordinary circu Duane by the dpuro@fs.fed.us 10/31/2001 Stephen J. Kimball, District Ranger Project was small in scale, Kimball much mitigation and oversite. Results were as exp Y Stephen J. done with 11/1/2001 skimball@fs.fed.us Stephen J. Kimball, District Ranger Yes, the DM was appropriate for the size and scope of the project. Very little impact to th Y Stephen J. Kimball skimball@fs.fed.us 11/1/2001 John R. Schultz - District Ranger Y This categorically excluded mantalosky@fs.fed.usspecific application of treatments identi Mike Antalosky project dealt with site 11/1/2001 Ernest Del Rio - DistrictY Ranger (former Ranger); Leon Blashock -mantalosky@fs.fed.usspecific application of treatments identi This categorically excluded project dealt with site Mike Antalosky current District Ranger 11/1/2001 Bob Hennes, District Ranger Y This type of action has occurred for many decades in this area and on similar habitats. T Brian Quinnbquinn@fs.fed.us 11/1/2001 James E. Denoncour - Y District Ranger The size and scope of this project was 11/2/2001 and very localized and met category nu tthake fs.fed.us very small james E. Denoncour - Y District Ranger The size and scope of the project met category 4. The down and damaged pine needed thake fs.fed.us 11/2/2001
Page 35
monitoring_data
David Schmid, Thorne Bay District Ranger Chasini Timber SaleMarks Y See Thomas Comments. It is my observation and decision that the Naukati tmarks@fs.fed.us 10/16/2001 David Schmid, Thorne Bay District Ranger Y In 1999, the Thorne Bay Marks District had 12.5 MMBF (out of 25 MMBF Nationally) cle Thomas Ranger tmarks@fs.fed.us 10/18/2001 Michael Kania, District Ranger Y There were no impacts of any consequence. Karen Kromrey kkromrey@fs.fed.us 11/1/2001 Michael Kania, District Ranger Y There were no impacts of any consequence. Karen Kromrey kkromrey@fs.fed.us 11/1/2001
Page 36